Difficult to Take Seriously (Sutliff Private Stock Molto Dolce in an Ozark Mt Meerschaum)

003-442-0020

When I first heard of Sutliff’s Molto Dolce it was because a friend on Facebook was flaunting its praises throughout many pipe groups.  And always eager to try new things, I picked up the 40 gram tin (1.5 ounces) from smokingpipes.com, HERE, for $6.11.

Smoking pipes has this to say about the tobacco;

Suffice it to say, Molto Dolce is the cream of the crop. A rich creamy sweet topping is applied to Burley, Virginia and Black Cavendish to create a delightful Aromatic smoke. In regard to te tin’s art work, Botticelli’s Primavera is depicted. A line from classical writer Lucrertius’ De Rerum Nature inspired the choice of this masterpiece. “With colours and odours excellent”. Many art critics proclaim this to be the world’s most mysterious painting.

I found that description intriguing, so I really tried to take this tobacco seriously.

First of all, the tin is huge.  It is easily the size of a 100 gram (3.5 ounce) tin, even though there is only 1.5 ounces in the can.  My guess is, that this tobacco is so cased, that if they tried to compact it into a normal tobacco tin, it would form into an unusable brick.  It also feels slightly sticky to the touch.

When I opened the tin this strong scent of caramel, and sweet honey got past even my limited sense of smell, and I thought the tobacco smelled of candy.

I handed the can to my wife, and she described the smell as, “as though a faerie farted!”

When I asked her how she would know that, she assured me that she actually was an expert in Seelie flatulence, and it, indeed, did smell like faerie farts.  I’ll just have to take her word for it.

On the other hand, both my hubby and I lit up a pipe full and both found that it tastes just like ice cream.

I feel it necessary to add, that my hubby could not get through an entire bowl of this tobacco, as he kept on laughing.  I, on the other hand, enjoyed the bowl on a lark, though I could see how he was amused by it.

Ice cream flavored tobacco, which smells of goblin gas, and you can see why I have trouble taking it seriously?

But in all seriousness, the tobacco smoked cleanly, and produced no tongue bite, which is surprising for such a heavily cased tobacco.  To be honest, I thoroughly enjoyed the bowl.

The tobacco has absolutely no punch to it, and is as smooth as cream, but is an enjoyable smoke.

Also, the room note is incredibly enjoyable.  A definite crowd pleaser, the caramel and vanilla scent is not overwhelming, much like a scented candle, or oil diffuser.

As for the Ozark Mountain Meerschaum, I always get a good smoke out of a Missouri Meerschaum.  Dirt cheap, you can get ‘em from smokingpipes.com, HERE, for $2.99 to $24.66 USD each.

002-543-0010

While Molto Dolce is not likely to become a regular on my rotation, I could thoroughly enjoy a bowl from now and again.  Thanks Mary for turning me onto this one!

Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em!

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Difficult to Take Seriously (Sutliff Private Stock Molto Dolce in an Ozark Mt Meerschaum)

  1. great review of the tobacco, I really enjoy the Molto Dolce, I’m both a novice and an aromatic lover. My only question with this article is the first person perspective and how it seems to change who is making the review half way through?? first you handed the tin to your wife then your hubby and you lit up a pipe, was this two separate reviews? it made me pause and re read the middle of your article. Please delete my comment if you edit this, maybe a paragraph or a header was missing? I know you just changed your format and layout.
    “”I handed the can to my wife, and she described the smell as, “as though a faerie farted!”

    When I asked her how she would know that, she assured me that she actually was an expert in Seelie flatulence, and it, indeed, did smell like faerie farts. I’ll just have to take her word for it.

    On the other hand, both my hubby and I lit up a pipe full and both found that it tastes just like ice cream.””

    Like

    • Perhaps I can answer your question Angi. Because tobacco is a hobby we all share, sometimes we light up a new tobacco and discuss it together at the kitchen table. If Erin finds mine or our partner Jamie’s commentary interesting or informative, sometimes he’ll include it. Sometimes I will do the same if they make remarks that I think are valuable. We do this because we try not to review the same products more than once in the magazine (though I don’t promise that will always be the case). Does that make more sense? Or does that just make it more confusing?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s